- un·sup·port·ed/ˌənsəˈpôrdəd/adjective
- (of a person or activity) not given physical, emotional or other assistance.
The ITI '24 unsupported project is something that's been gnawing at the edges of my chocolate fueled adventures on the trail for many years. After 5x 1000 mile Nome finishes and 2x 350 mile McGrath finishes from 8 starts over 10+ years since my first Alaska trip, I've dedicated a chunk of my life to honing my craft of winter travel and gear refinement...and this last aspect is an intrinsic reward of the race to me.
'I yearned to do that - to create my own gear, with my own designs to solve problems in traversing the trail'
I'd read stories from the pioneers of fatbiking in the golden era; of garage built frames, rims welded together, tyres sewn together and custom components to increase the flotation of a loaded bike on the snow to travel the Iditarod Trail. I've studied these bikes up close in the unofficial fatbike museum at Speedway Cycles in Anchorage and I have to say - we got it eeeeeasy nowadays. I yearned to do some of that - to create my own gear, with my own designs to solve problems in traversing the trail. I've made a bunch of stuff over the years and this unsupported project gave me the opportunity to flex those maker muscles again, along with building a highly refined and functional kick-ass bike with the best modern materials a bike mechanic can afford.
However, another aspect that is becoming a slight irritant to me is the modern progression of 3rd party support on the trail - sometimes unbidden by well meaning folk. Those early days of the event, where veteran racers would sleep outside with no shelter cabins, or go a long time between resupply - if it was even there at all - that's what drew me in to a yearning for that slightly purer experience with less or no support, even if it meant stretching things out a bit. Put simply - I feel too much support has crept in and is readily accepted by racers, instead of declined. Curmudgeon much? I wouldn't say so of myself, but I think we can do better in terms of what we seek out there on the trail. I can only change my response to support-creep for my own outcomes.
There was a quote from Bill Merchant many years ago that sums up my perspective on this - it's not word for word but the emotive is the same:
'When you solve too many problems for folks on the trail, you take away some of the reasons for the true adventurer wanting to be out there in the first place and it lessens the experience for them'
Comfort at -40C |
- The unsupported racer is to carry 100% from the start, everything they need to get to Nome - no mandatories other than GPS Trace unit as per 'regular' race rules
- No indoor time (includes outhouses, porches of cabins or schools etc) and use only the shelter that the racer carries or natural cover (trees)
- No resupply or forwarding of equipment
- No mechanical support or shipping of parts/equipment
- No lingering in villages
- No camping in villages or near cabins
- No assistance of any kind from other racers or 3rd parties
- The unsupported racer is to ride solo where possible, with minimal/no pairing with other racers - no drafting
- Any racer applying for unsupported MUST have completed 2x North route and 2x South route in close proximity years
- The unsupported racer is to check in at checkpoints (outside the CP) with minimal time contact
- GPS Trace unit/Trackleader tracking as per regular racer, to verify location
- All other regular ITI rules apply
- Breaches are considered a failure of the goal, resultant DNF
- Behaviour must be in line with the true spirit of human powered racing and to remain competitive with the highest level of integrity
- Leave no trace
- Make good choices